Side A
shared expenses
Side B
Splid – Split group bills
Splid – Split group bills
tricount: Split & Settle Bills
tricount: Split & Settle Bills

Splid – Split group bills

Perfect for vacations with friends, shared flats, and couples 🏖🏠 💑

tricount: Split & Settle Bills

Split group bills, track all expenses & settle up easily for any shared cost

Rank

3

For keyword

shared expenses

Rank

2

USEnglish (United States)
Google Play
Rank History
Splid – Split group bills
tricount: Split & Settle Bills
Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-13: rank 3Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-14: rank 3Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-15: rank 3Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-16: rank 2Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-17: rank 3Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-18: rank 3Splid – Split group bills on 2026-06-19: rank 3tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-13: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-14: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-15: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-16: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-17: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-18: rank 1tricount: Split & Settle Bills on 2026-06-19: rank 2
A33
67B
01Store Presence
4.25 / 12.5
vs
8.25 / 12.5
App A
App B
First released · max +1.5 pts
Nov 20, 2017
First released max +1.5 pts
+1.5Jul 1, 2011
Last updated · max +1.5 pts
Aug 23, 2025
Last updated max +1.5 pts
+1.5Jun 2, 2026
Screenshot count · max +0.5 pts
4
Screenshot count max +0.5 pts
+0.58
Downloads · max +3 pts
1,000,000+ +1.5
Downloads max +3 pts
+1.510,000,000+
App price · max +0.5 pts
Free +0.25
App price max +0.5 pts
+0.25Free
Min IAP price · max +0.5 pts
3.49 $
Min IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.5No IAP
Max IAP price · max +0.5 pts
3.49 $
Max IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.5No IAP
Ads · max +0.5 pts
No +0.5
Ads max +0.5 pts
Yes
Rating · max +2 pts
4.9 ★ +1.25
Rating max +2 pts
+0.754.8 ★
Rating count · max +2 pts
83K +0.75
Rating count max +2 pts
+1.25186K
02Keyword Optimization
3.5 / 9
vs
5.5 / 9
App A
App B
Keyword in Title · max +3 pts
No +1.5
Keyword in Title max +3 pts
+1.5No
Keyword in Short Description · max +2 pts
1/2 words

Perfect for vacations with friends, shared flats, and couples 🏖🏠 💑

Keyword in Short Description max +2 pts
+2All words (2/2)

Split group bills, track all expenses & settle up easily for any shared cost

Keyword in Description · max +2 pts
Yes (exact) +1
Keyword in Description max +2 pts
+1Yes (exact)
Keyword Density · max +1 pts
Medium (0.9%) +0.5
Keyword Density max +1 pts
+0.5Medium (1.7%)
Title Length · max +1 pts
Optimised (25 chars) +0.5
Title Length max +1 pts
+0.5Optimised (30 chars)
03Conversion Intelligence
1 / 8
vs
7 / 8

tricount: Split & Settle Bills leads with a clear, user-focused value proposition and strong trust signals, including a group lifestyle image and explicit 'no limits, no ads, no fees' claims. Splid – Split group bills relies on raw UI and feature captions, with no visible trust badges or user-count claims. Both apps show core features, but tricount: Split & Settle Bills creates more emotional appeal and credibility.

Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b

Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.

App A

App A screenshot 1App A screenshot 2App A screenshot 3App A screenshot 4

App B

App B screenshot 1App B screenshot 2App B screenshot 3App B screenshot 4

Value Proposition

B leads
AOn par

Splid – Split group bills shows 'Split bills quickly and easily' and 'Perfect for holidays and housemates' but relies on generic UI and captions.

BStrong

tricount: Split & Settle Bills uses 'The easiest way to split the bill' and 'No limits. No ads. No fees.' with a group photo, making the benefit immediate.

Clarity

B leads
AOn par

Splid – Split group bills shows expense lists, group sharing, and export options, but captions are generic ('All your expenses at a glance').

BStrong

tricount: Split & Settle Bills uses clear captions like 'Manage expenses in one tap' and 'Split any way you like' paired with concrete UI flows.

Emotional Hook

B leads
AWeak

Splid – Split group bills uses only raw UI and generic banners; no lifestyle imagery or outcome-focused copy is present.

BStrong

tricount: Split & Settle Bills features a group of friends enjoying the app together, visually reinforcing the shared experience and relief.

Trust Signals

B leads
AWeak

Splid – Split group bills shows no user-count claims, awards, or badges in any screenshot.

BStrong

tricount: Split & Settle Bills claims 'No limits. No ads. No fees.' and visually emphasizes these as trust cues in the second screenshot.

04Review Intelligence
6.5 / 10
vs
3.5 / 10

Splid – Split group bills is praised for being simple, easy to use, and for handling shared expenses without ads or registration. The recurring pain points are missing features like recurring expenses, date visibility, and export/account-management options. tricount: Split & Settle Bills is also praised for being easy to use and useful for travel, but recurring complaints focus on syncing, disappearing data, and buggy calculations.

App A: 100 reviews App B: 100 reviews

App A

100 reviews

Pain points

Recurring expenses missing

Medium

Date visibility and record detail

Low

Export and account-management gaps

Low

Strengths

Simple and easy to use

High

No ads and no registration

High

Shared expenses and trip tracking

High

App B

100 reviews

Pain points

Syncing and disappearing data

High

Buggy calculations and wrong math

Medium

Export and browser access missing

Low

Strengths

Travel and group expense tracking

High

Easy to use and convenient

High

Free and no paid subscription

Medium
05Positioning Gap
5.5 / 15
vs
9.5 / 15

Splid – Split group bills leads with an offline-first, no-sign-up utility for vacations, roommates, and couples, while tricount: Split & Settle Bills leads with scale and reassurance through "over 17 million users", "100% free with no ads or limits", and a broader shared-expenses frame. The mismatch is that Splid is more specific about usage context and setup friction, while tricount is more explicit about trust, breadth, and zero-cost adoption.

App A

Positioning

Offline-first split tool

Target audience

Vacationers, roommates, and couples sharing costs

Value promise

Enter shared expenses and settle balances easily, online or offline

Tone

practical, relaxed

App B

Positioning

Scale-backed expense manager

Target audience

Friends, roommates, couples, and event planners

Value promise

Split, track, and settle shared expenses with no ads or limits

Tone

feature-focused, reassuring

Gap

Splid – Split group bills leads with situational utility and friction removal, while tricount: Split & Settle Bills leads with trust, scale, and zero-cost reassurance.

Opportunity

That gap lets Splid own the user who wants a fast setup for a trip, flat, or couple account without creating login friction or needing connectivity.

Risk

Splid – Split group bills leans heavily on "works on and offline" and "no sign-up required", but it does not foreground a stronger trust cue like scale, free access, or a named outcome beyond settling balances. For first-time searchers, that can make the app feel narrower and less proven than tricount: Split & Settle Bills, which may reduce install confidence even when the feature set fits.

Strategic advantage

Splid – Split group bills can lean into low-friction coordination for travelers, roommates, and couples who need to log expenses immediately, even without signal. That is a concrete buying motive for people in transit or sharing costs in the moment, where offline entry and no account creation matter more than broad brand proof.

Missed opportunity

Neither listing owns the privacy-first / no-account angle as a primary reason to choose the app. That is a narrower whitespace for users who want shared-expense tracking without tying it to a login, cloud identity, or long onboarding.

06Final Verdict
33 / 100
vs
67 / 100

App A

33

Splid – Split group bills

Far behind

B wins

App B

67

tricount: Split & Settle Bills

Dominant

For shared expenses, tricount: Split & Settle Bills holds the lead over Splid – Split group bills, and that edge is defensible because the listing combines stronger trust, clearer conversion cues, and broader keyword fit. Splid – Split group bills ranks close, but its current framing is narrower and less confidence-building for first-time searchers.

Why it wins

tricount: Split & Settle Bills is stronger on store presence, keyword optimisation, and especially conversion intelligence, where it pairs a clear value proposition with no limits, no ads, no fees and scale proof. Splid – Split group bills has the better review signal, but that is not enough to offset weaker trust cues and a less explicit shared expenses promise.

Biggest opportunity

Splid – Split group bills can win more shared expenses intent by owning the offline, no-sign-up use case for travelers, roommates, and couples who need to log costs immediately.

Next priority

Ship the subtitle Split bills offline, no sign-up needed to make the low-friction shared expenses angle explicit.

Run your own comparison

Compare more apps, in any market or language.

See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.

Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.

Try AppTracker free

People also compared