Fasting App & Calorie Counter
Lose weight without dieting. Intermittent fasting app for weight loss & health.
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Rank
13
For keyword
Rank
2
English (United States)Lose weight without dieting. Intermittent fasting app for weight loss & health.
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Fasting App & Calorie Counter and Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting both state the weight-loss benefit in the first screenshot, but the "25M users lost weight with fasting in 2023" callout gives Fasting App & Calorie Counter the cleaner trust story. Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting's ★4.9 badge and five-star testimonial rows imitate store rating UI, a Play policy risk. Neither listing shows a person experiencing the outcome, so the emotional hook rests on copy alone for both.
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
TiedFirst screenshot pairs "Fasting Tracker" with "Easily Lose Weight" and a "25M users lost weight" callout, so the benefit lands instantly.
"Fasting Made Easy" plus "Lose weight without counting" on the first screenshot states the outcome and a differentiator in one glance.
Clarity
TiedScreenshots show a 16:8 timer, a calorie tracker with barcode scanning, plan schedules like "12:12", and tagged meals: four concrete features.
A live countdown timer, the "Your Program is Ready" weight projection chart, and the "Watch Your Progress" stats grid make the toolset obvious.
Emotional Hook
Tied"Easily Lose Weight" names the outcome, but every frame is UI on gradient backgrounds; no imagery of a person enjoying the result.
"Reach 165 lbs by Jul 28" and "Your body does the work while you sleep" name outcomes, yet the dark UI shots include no lifestyle scene.
Trust Signals
A leads"25M users lost weight with fasting in 2023" is a concrete numeric claim on screenshot one; the "Popular Health & Fitness App" laurel is self-applied, though.
Five-star rows beside each "Real Results" testimonial and the ★4.9 badge on screenshot one imitate store rating UI, which Play guidelines reject.
Reviews of Fasting App & Calorie Counter repeatedly praise its ease of use and combined fasting plus calorie tracking, but a large share of recent reviews describe being locked out after the 7-day trial and a lengthy onboarding questionnaire before the app can be used. Reviews of Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting are dominated by praise for its simplicity and ad-free experience, with a recurring concern that formerly free features are moving behind a subscription.
App A
Pain points
Trial lockout blocks access to logged data
HighLong onboarding questionnaire before first use
MediumFood logging accuracy concerns
LowStrengths
Easy to use fasting setup
MediumVisible weight loss results
MediumFasting and calorie counting in one app
LowApp B
Pain points
Features shifting behind a subscription
MediumMonthly price seen as too high, one-time purchase requested
LowStrengths
Simple, focused experience
HighNo ads or subscription prompts
MediumExplains body stages during a fast
MediumFasting App & Calorie Counter stakes out effortless mass-market weight loss, promising results "without dieting" and bundling a calorie counter into one guided system. Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting stakes out indie trust and simplicity: a solo developer, "No account. Zero ads.", data never sold, core timer free forever. The two listings barely overlap: one sells an outcome-maximising all-in-one program, the other sells a clutter-free private tool, so a searcher's choice hinges on whether they want guidance or minimalism.
App A
Positioning
All-in-one effortless weight loss
Target audience
Broad mass market, beginner and experienced fasters alike
Value promise
Lose weight without dieting or exercise through guided fasting plans
Tone
Promotional, benefit-heavy, mass-market
App B
Positioning
Private, minimalist indie tool
Target audience
Fasters frustrated by account walls, ads, and clutter
Value promise
Simple, private, ad-free fasting tracking with the core timer free forever
Tone
Personal, candid, first-person indie voice
Gap
Fasting App & Calorie Counter leads with an outcome promise ("Lose weight without dieting" plus a built-in calorie counter), while Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting leads with a trust promise ("No account. Zero ads.", solo developer, data never sold); neither contests the other's ground.
Opportunity
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting deliberately stays a lean timer, which leaves the complete weight-loss system ground open: Fasting App & Calorie Counter can own "fasting plus nutrition in one app" for users who want more than a stopwatch.
Risk
Sweeping claims in Fasting App & Calorie Counter, "Say bye to exercise and dieting" and a promise that it "guarantees quick and sustainable results", read as overreach next to Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting's candid, verifiable claims (no ads, no account), and sceptical searchers may discount the entire listing as marketing inflation and choose the plainer-spoken rival.
Strategic advantage
The calorie counter plus fasting plans combination is a real structural edge for beginners who want one guided system instead of assembling a timer and a food tracker separately; Fasting App & Calorie Counter's step-by-step guide framing speaks directly to that first-time-faster buying motive.
Missed opportunity
Neither listing claims scientific or expert credibility: no dietitian, clinician, or published-evidence backing appears in either description, an underserved angle for health-cautious users who search "intermittent fasting" wanting to know it is safe for them specifically.
App A
44
Fasting App & Calorie Counter
Slight gap
B wins
App B
56
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Slight lead
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting's No. 2 rank for intermittent fasting looks defensible: the exact phrase is its title, its "No account. Zero ads." promise is verifiable on sight, and recent reviews echo that same simplicity. Fasting App & Calorie Counter at rank 13 actually shows the stronger screenshot trust story, but weaker keyword optimisation and recurring trial-lockout complaints in reviews leave the gap intact.
Why it wins
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting carries intermittent fasting verbatim in its title and backs it with candid, checkable claims ("No account. Zero ads.") that reviews confirm as real simplicity and an ad-free experience. Beside that plain-spoken pitch, sweeping lines in Fasting App & Calorie Counter such as "guarantees quick and sustainable results" invite scepticism from exactly the cautious searchers this keyword attracts.
Biggest opportunity
Fasting App & Calorie Counter's short description already includes intermittent fasting exactly, so the realistic gain is conversion: the all-in-one calorie counter plus fasting plans bundle and the "25M users lost weight with fasting in 2023" proof are structural edges Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting cannot match, yet the copy currently leads with an unprovable no-dieting promise instead of them.
Next priority
The test worth running next is whether a short description that leads with the concrete bundle, "One app for intermittent fasting & calories: 16:8, OMAD plans, no diet change." (78 characters), converts intermittent fasting searchers better than the current "without dieting" framing. Keeping the basic timer and read-only data access available after the 7-day trial would also blunt the single most repeated review complaint feeding the trust gap.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker free