Side A
time tracker
Side B
Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker
Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker

Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker

Time tracker for better habits. Set goals, track progress, boost productivity.

WorkingHours Time Tracker

Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker

Rank

9

For keyword

time tracker

Rank

3

USEnglish (United States)
Google Play
Rank History
Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker
Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-13: rank 6Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-14: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-15: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-16: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-17: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-18: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-19: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-20: rank 5Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-21: rank 9Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-22: rank 9Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-23: rank 7Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-24: rank 7Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-25: rank 8Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker on 2026-07-26: rank 9WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-13: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-14: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-15: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-16: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-17: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-18: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-19: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-20: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-21: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-22: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-23: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-24: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-25: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-26: rank 3
A43
57B
01Store Presence
4.25 / 12.5
vs
8.25 / 12.5
App A
App B
First released · max +1.5 pts
Jun 11, 2020
First released max +1.5 pts
+1.5Sep 20, 2017
Last updated · max +1.5 pts
May 18, 2026
Last updated max +1.5 pts
+1.5Jul 25, 2026
Screenshot count · max +0.5 pts
8 +0.25
Screenshot count max +0.5 pts
+0.258
Downloads · max +3 pts
100,000+ +1.5
Downloads max +3 pts
+1.5100,000+
App price · max +0.5 pts
Free +0.25
App price max +0.5 pts
+0.25Free
Min IAP price · max +0.5 pts
1.99 $
Min IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.50.99 $
Max IAP price · max +0.5 pts
35.99 $
Max IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.510.99 $
Ads · max +0.5 pts
No +0.5
Ads max +0.5 pts
Yes
Rating · max +2 pts
4.7 ★ +0.75
Rating max +2 pts
+1.254.8 ★
Rating count · max +2 pts
5K +1
Rating count max +2 pts
+14K
02Keyword Optimization
5 / 9
vs
4 / 9
App A
App B
Keyword in Title · max +3 pts
Yes (exact) +1.5
Keyword in Title max +3 pts
+1.5Yes (exact)
Keyword in Short Description · max +2 pts
Yes (exact) +2

Time tracker for better habits. Set goals, track progress, boost productivity.

Keyword in Short Description max +2 pts
All words (2/2)

Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker

Keyword in Description · max +2 pts
Yes (exact) +1
Keyword in Description max +2 pts
+1Yes (exact)
Keyword Density · max +1 pts
High (3.6%)
Keyword Density max +1 pts
+1Medium (1.9%)
Title Length · max +1 pts
Optimised (29 chars) +0.5
Title Length max +1 pts
+0.5Optimised (25 chars)
03Conversion Intelligence
4.5 / 8
vs
3.5 / 8

Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker leads on clarity with readable portrait screenshots and a distinct benefit headline per screen; WorkingHours Time Tracker holds a stronger value proposition, naming its audience on screenshot 1 and surfacing dollar earnings across screenshots 1 and 2. Timelog's outcome-oriented captions ("Take control of your time", "Focus with smart timers") give it an emotional edge, but neither listing uses lifestyle imagery to show a user experiencing the result. Both sides are equally weak on trust signals, with no testimonials, user counts, or press quotes visible in any screenshot.

Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b

Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.

App A

App A screenshot 1App A screenshot 2App A screenshot 3App A screenshot 4

App B

App B screenshot 1App B screenshot 2App B screenshot 3App B screenshot 4

Value Proposition

B leads
AOn par

"Take control of your time" is generic; screenshot 1's goal-countdown rows show the feature but don't surface a concrete outcome for 'time tracker' searchers.

BStrong

Screenshot 1 "For freelancer & employees" names the audience immediately; dollar totals in screenshots 1 and 2 make the financial value concrete.

Clarity

A leads
AStrong

Each portrait screenshot names one function: activity goals with countdowns, countdown timer with Rain/Focus mode options, weekly category breakdown, per-activity streak heatmap. All are immediately readable.

BOn par

Screenshots 1 and 2 use a tilted angle that obscures project tag labels; screenshot 4 "GPS geofence, notification & widget" names three concrete features clearly.

Emotional Hook

A leads
AOn par

"Take control of your time" and "Focus with smart timers" name outcomes, but all four screenshots show raw UI on a plain gradient with no lifestyle imagery.

BWeak

"For freelancer & employees" labels the audience; "GPS geofence, notification & widget" lists a feature; no outcome-framed copy or lifestyle imagery appears in any screenshot.

Trust Signals

Tied
AWeak

No testimonials, user-count claims, press quotes, or compliance badges appear across any of the four screenshots.

BWeak

No testimonials, user-count claims, press quotes, or compliance badges visible across all four screenshots.

04Review Intelligence
5 / 10
vs
5 / 10

"Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker" earns consistently strong ratings across 100 reviews, with study-session tracking for students as the single most praised use case and a generous free feature set cited by many users; the only recurring pain points are intermittent timer and Pomodoro notification reliability and subscription pricing concerns. "WorkingHours Time Tracker" draws sustained appreciation from freelancers for its invoicing and timesheet export capabilities and a clean, focused interface, with occasional complaints that convenience features such as widgets require the paid tier.

App A: 100 reviews App B: 100 reviews

App A

100 reviews

Pain points

Timer and Pomodoro notification reliability

Low

High subscription pricing

Low

Strengths

Student study-time tracking as core use case

High

Generous free tier with no ads

Medium

Clean minimalistic UI with detailed weekly and monthly statistics

Medium

App B

100 reviews

Pain points

Core convenience features locked behind paywall

Low

Geofencing clock-in/out unreliability

Low

Strengths

Freelancer and contractor work-hour tracking

High

Simple, focused interface for logging work hours

High

Timesheet-to-invoice export for billing workflows

Medium
05Positioning Gap
2 / 15
vs
13 / 15

Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker positions itself as a personal-development tool, framing time tracking as a path to habit formation and goal achievement, while WorkingHours Time Tracker stakes out a distinct professional lane as an administrative utility for freelancers and employees managing billable hours and earnings. The two listings address nearly non-overlapping search intents within 'time tracker', but Timelog's broadly aspirational framing leaves it vulnerable to category blur among users scanning for a crisper signal of what sets it apart.

App A

Positioning

Personal-development time accountability

Target audience

Self-improvers tracking time against personal goals

Value promise

Transform how you spend your day by tracking time against meaningful goals

Tone

Aspirational, self-improvement-focused, warm but generic

App B

Positioning

Professional work-hours billing utility

Target audience

Freelancers, contractors, and employees tracking billable hours

Value promise

Track work hours and earnings without making time-logging an admin burden

Tone

Practical, feature-rich, professionally direct

Gap

Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker leads with personal goal achievement and habit formation, while WorkingHours Time Tracker leads with professional billing and work-hour administration — two distinct intent clusters that share a search keyword but speak to entirely different buying motivations.

Opportunity

Because WorkingHours Time Tracker fully vacates the personal-development lane, Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker has room to sharpen its goal-directed angle without head-on competition, owning the segment of users who track time to grow, not to bill.

Risk

Timelog's short description — 'Set goals, track progress, boost productivity' — strings together generic productivity phrases with no named user or specific pain point, which risks blending into the category background for users scanning multiple results; a user who sees ten apps promising productivity has no structural reason to choose Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker over any of them.

Strategic advantage

Timelog's explicit pairing of time tracking with goal-setting speaks to self-improvement users who treat time as a personal resource, not a billing instrument — a segment WorkingHours Time Tracker structurally excludes by opening with 'freelancers, hourly workers, employees, contractors and consultants'.

Missed opportunity

Neither listing addresses the accountability gap — the user who wants their time tracker to reveal whether they followed through on commitments, not merely log that time passed. Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker mentions 'streak tracking and pattern recognition' but buries it deep in the description; WorkingHours Time Tracker focuses purely on recording. The 'did I actually do what I planned?' use case is unowned by either listing.

06Final Verdict
43 / 100
vs
57 / 100

App A

43

Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker

Slight gap

B wins

App B

57

WorkingHours Time Tracker

Slight lead

WorkingHours Time Tracker holds the #3 spot for the time tracker keyword against Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker's #9, a gap driven by a near-zero positioning score and a store-presence disadvantage that leaves Timelog's intent unclear to professional searchers. WorkingHours' ranking looks defensible: its short description names a concrete audience and concrete outputs, giving it structural keyword-intent alignment that outweighs Timelog's edge in screenshot clarity and keyword placement.

Why it wins

WorkingHours Time Tracker's short description, 'Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker', delivers professional intent matching for the time tracker keyword that Timelog's aspirational framing cannot replicate, backed by a store-presence score twice as high.

Biggest opportunity

The short description already includes time tracker exactly, so the remaining gain for Timelog - Goal & Time Tracker is converting goal-directed searchers faster by naming a specific outcome rather than the generic chain 'Set goals, track progress, boost productivity'.

Next priority

The remaining test is whether 'Time tracker for personal goals: build habits, track progress, beat your targets' (80 chars) makes the self-improvement angle in the time tracker space faster to recognise than the current three-phrase string, grounding the promise in a named aspiration over a list of category verbs.

Run your own comparison

Compare more apps, in any market or language.

See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.

Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.

Try AppTracker free

People also compared