Fast: Intermittent Fasting
16:8 Fasting Tracker, OMAD Diet & Fasting Schedule for Weight Loss Health Plan
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Rank
15
For keyword
Rank
2
English (United States)16:8 Fasting Tracker, OMAD Diet & Fasting Schedule for Weight Loss Health Plan
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting leads every screen with an outcome: "Lose weight without counting", a "Reach 165 lbs by Jul 28" projection graph, and named photo testimonials. Fast: Intermittent Fasting shows a friendly avocado and clear tracker UI, but its captions name features ("Real-Time Fasting Tracker", "Daily Step Counter") rather than results, and its only trust cues are self-stated "4.6 Ratings" and "200k+ Downloads".
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
B leads"Fast: Intermittent Fasting"'s hero says "Your Daily Intermittent Fasting Tracker" — clear category, but the weight-loss benefit stays in the subtitle, not the first frame.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" pairs "Fasting Made Easy" with "Lose weight without counting" and a "21-Day Fat Loss" plan projecting a goal weight by date.
Clarity
Tied"Fast: Intermittent Fasting" shows a labeled timer ("09h 12m", "16:8"), a plan picker (12:12, 16:8, 20:4), and a "Daily Step Counter" tab.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" shows a running timer ("12h 23m") and a stats screen with "304 Fasts" and a weight chart, making function obvious.
Emotional Hook
B leads"Fast: Intermittent Fasting" uses a friendly avocado mascot, but screens 2-4 are raw UI with feature captions ("Daily Step Counter"), no user-outcome moment.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" leans on aspiration copy — "Your body does the work while you sleep" and a descending weight graph — but shows no lifestyle scene.
Trust Signals
B leads"Fast: Intermittent Fasting" shows "200k+ Downloads" and "4.6 Ratings" in laurel wreaths; the star-rating restatement risks imitating store rating UI, and no testimonials appear.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" carries named photo testimonials (Mitch M., Jessica M., Nicole R.) plus "1.8M+ Users" and "24k Reviews" claims.
Reviews of Fast: Intermittent Fasting are dominated by praise for having no ads and being easy to use, though a recurring pain point is that a previously free timer and features now sit behind a paywall. Reviews of Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting similarly praise its simple, no-fluff design, but carry a more frequent recurring complaint that the app has gradually moved core functions behind a subscription. Both titles share the same tension: strong goodwill for a clean, ad-free experience set against frustration when free features become paid.
App A
Pain points
Free features moved behind a paywall
MediumFree timer now locked
MediumStrengths
Clean, ad-free experience
MediumEasy to use for beginners
MediumExplains each fasting stage
LowApp B
Pain points
Core functions require payment
MediumForced into a program to log fasts
LowStrengths
Simple, no-fluff design
HighNo ads and no sign-in
MediumSupports weight loss
LowEasy Fast Intermittent Fasting stakes out privacy and simplicity as its lead, opening on "the simple, private, ad-free fasting tracker" with a named solo developer and "2.4M+ people" as proof. Fast: Intermittent Fasting leads with method breadth and keyword coverage, stacking 16:8, OMAD, alternate-day, water and 3-day fasting across a tracker framing. The mismatch is trust-and-relief positioning against comprehensiveness-and-utility positioning, and the second stance currently reads as more distinctive.
App A
Positioning
Comprehensive method tracker
Target audience
Fasters from beginner to advanced, weight-loss focused
Value promise
Track any fasting method to reach weight loss and health goals
Tone
feature-focused, functional
App B
Positioning
Private, simple fasting tracker
Target audience
Fasters wanting no account, no ads, no clutter
Value promise
Start fasting simply and privately, core timer free forever
Tone
personal, reassuring, trust-led
Gap
Fast: Intermittent Fasting leads with method breadth (16:8, OMAD, alternate-day, water, 3-day), while Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting leads with privacy and simplicity ("No account. Zero ads.") plus a named developer and user count.
Opportunity
Because Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting anchors on short daily fasts (14:10, 16:8, 18:6) and simplicity, Fast: Intermittent Fasting can own the serious, all-methods faster who wants extended and advanced protocols in one tracker.
Risk
Fast: Intermittent Fasting offers no reassurance on account, ads, or data handling, so users primed by Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting's "Your data is never sold" framing may read the denser listing as the less trustworthy default and choose the app that addressed their privacy concern directly.
Strategic advantage
The listing already names advanced protocols ("3 day fast", alternate-day, water fasting) that the competitor's daily-fast framing does not, giving Fast: Intermittent Fasting a credible claim to committed and experienced fasters exploring extended methods.
Missed opportunity
Neither listing anchors on a concrete transformation or beginner hand-holding: both describe tools and methods but neither promises a guided path for an anxious first-time faster unsure which method to start with.
App A
31
Fast: Intermittent Fasting
Far behind
B wins
App B
69
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Dominant
For intermittent fasting, Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting holds rank 2 to Fast: Intermittent Fasting's 15, and that gap looks defensible on more than position: outcome-led screens, a privacy-and-simplicity hook, and named proof all pull the same direction. Fast: Intermittent Fasting owns broader method coverage and warmer reviews, but neither of those yet turns a browser into a download as fast.
Why it wins
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting frames the listing as a promise, "Lose weight without counting" plus a dated weight projection and "2.4M+ people" as proof, while Fast: Intermittent Fasting still opens on feature captions like "Real-Time Fasting Tracker" that describe tools rather than the result an intermittent fasting searcher is after.
Biggest opportunity
Fast: Intermittent Fasting already carries intermittent fasting in its title, so the real gain here is converting its genuine review goodwill, the no ads and ease-of-use praise, into visible on-screen proof instead of feature labels.
Next priority
The remaining test is whether leading the short description with that review-backed strength, e.g. "...16:8 & OMAD, no ads, free timer to start now", reads as clearer value than the current stacked feature terms for intermittent fasting browsers.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker freePeople also compared
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingfasting timer
Fasting App & Calorie CounterEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Fastin: Intermittent FastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Intermittent Fasting TrackerEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Intermittent Fasting TrackerEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
If: Intermittent Fasting 16:8Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Fasting - Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting