Side A
meal planner
Side B
Plan Meals - Meal Planner
Plan Meals - Meal Planner
Plan to Eat: Meal Planner
Plan to Eat: Meal Planner

Plan Meals - Meal Planner

The all-in-one Meal Planner. Plan meals, manage recipes, make grocery lists.

Plan to Eat: Meal Planner

Recipe storage, meal planning calendar, and automated grocery lists.

Rank

14

For keyword

meal planner

Rank

4

USEnglish (United States)
Google Play
Rank History
Plan Meals - Meal Planner
Plan to Eat: Meal Planner
Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-06-23: rank 13Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-06-24: rank 13Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-06-28: rank 13Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-06-29: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-06-30: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-07-01: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-07-02: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-07-03: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-07-04: rank 14Plan Meals - Meal Planner on 2026-07-05: rank 14Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-22: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-23: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-24: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-25: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-26: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-27: rank 6Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-28: rank 6Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-29: rank 6Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-06-30: rank 6Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-07-01: rank 6Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-07-02: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-07-03: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-07-04: rank 4Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on 2026-07-05: rank 4
A38
62B
01Store Presence
5 / 13.5
vs
8.5 / 13.5
App A
App B
First released · max +1.5 pts
Dec 7, 2016 +1.5
First released max +1.5 pts
May 31, 2018
Last updated · max +1.5 pts
Jan 1, 2025
Last updated max +1.5 pts
+1.5Jun 2, 2026
Screenshot count · max +0.5 pts
6
Screenshot count max +0.5 pts
+0.523
Preview video · max +1 pts
Preview video max +1 pts
+1Yes
Downloads · max +3 pts
500,000+ +1.5
Downloads max +3 pts
+1.5100,000+
App price · max +0.5 pts
Free +0.25
App price max +0.5 pts
+0.25Free
Min IAP price · max +0.5 pts
1.49 $ +0.5
Min IAP price max +0.5 pts
39.00 $
Max IAP price · max +0.5 pts
59.99 $
Max IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.554.99 $
Ads · max +0.5 pts
No +0.25
Ads max +0.5 pts
+0.25No
Rating · max +2 pts
4.0 ★
Rating max +2 pts
+24.7 ★
Rating count · max +2 pts
4K +1
Rating count max +2 pts
+13K
02Keyword Optimization
4.5 / 9
vs
4.5 / 9
App A
App B
Keyword in Title · max +3 pts
Yes (exact) +1.5
Keyword in Title max +3 pts
+1.5Yes (exact)
Keyword in Short Description · max +2 pts
Yes (exact) +2

The all-in-one Meal Planner. Plan meals, manage recipes, make grocery lists.

Keyword in Short Description max +2 pts
1/2 words

Recipe storage, meal planning calendar, and automated grocery lists.

Keyword in Description · max +2 pts
1/2 words
Keyword in Description max +2 pts
+2All words (2/2)
Keyword Density · max +1 pts
Medium (2.1%) +0.5
Keyword Density max +1 pts
+0.5Medium (1.1%)
Title Length · max +1 pts
Optimised (25 chars) +0.5
Title Length max +1 pts
+0.5Optimised (25 chars)
03Conversion Intelligence
3 / 8
vs
5 / 8

Both listings read instantly as meal planners: "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" opens with "Meal Planning, Simplified." over a filled weekly grid, and "Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" leads with "Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009". They tie on value and feature clarity, but "Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" pulls ahead on trust with a concrete user-count claim that "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" never surfaces.

Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b

Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.

App A

App A screenshot 1App A screenshot 2App A screenshot 3App A screenshot 4

App B

App B screenshot 1App B screenshot 2App B screenshot 3App B screenshot 4

Value Proposition

Tied
AStrong

"Plan Meals - Meal Planner"'s 1st screenshot pairs "Meal Planning, Simplified." with a filled Mon/Tue/Wed breakfast-lunch-dinner grid, so the core benefit lands immediately.

BStrong

"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner"'s 1st screenshot states "The Meal Planner Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009", naming the category and backing it in one line.

Clarity

Tied
AStrong

"Plan Meals - Meal Planner" shows the weekly plan grid, AI diet/cuisine plan builder, recipe discovery, and recipe book across screenshots 1, 2 and 4, each a concrete UI.

BStrong

"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner"'s 2nd screenshot shows recipe import via Instagram/TikTok icons and the 4th shows "Cook smarter step-by-step" mode, features named plainly.

Emotional Hook

Tied
AWeak

"Plan Meals - Meal Planner" uses food-photo backdrops (pasta, basil) behind phone mockups in screenshots 1 and 4, but no target user appears and captions name features, not feelings.

BWeak

"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" places UI mockups on flat teal with orange-slice accents; "Cook smarter step-by-step" names a capability, with no person or outcome scene shown.

Trust Signals

B leads
AWeak

"Plan Meals - Meal Planner" surfaces no user counts, ratings, testimonials, awards, or badges in any of its four screenshots.

BStrong

"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner"'s 1st screenshot leads with "Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009", a concrete user-count and longevity proof point.

04Review Intelligence
3.5 / 10
vs
6.5 / 10

Reviews of Plan Meals - Meal Planner pair frequent praise for its simple, no-frills interface and automatic grocery list with recurring complaints about the subscription paywall (including snacks and multi-week planning locked behind it) and reports of saved meal plans being deleted. Plan to Eat: Meal Planner draws overwhelmingly positive feedback centered on web and social-media recipe importing and automatic shopping-list generation, with only occasional notes that a subscription is required.

App A: 100 reviews App B: 100 reviews

App A

100 reviews

Pain points

Subscription paywall friction

High

Saved plans getting deleted

Medium

Incomplete shopping list generation

Low

Strengths

Simple and easy to use

High

Automatic grocery list

Medium

Uncomplicated free option

Medium

App B

100 reviews

Pain points

Subscription required to use

Low

Strengths

Recipe import from the web

High

Automatic shopping list from recipes

High

Long-term loyal users

High
05Positioning Gap
5 / 15
vs
10 / 15

Plan Meals - Meal Planner stakes an all-in-one stance, weighting plan, recipes, and grocery lists as three equal features wrapped in ease-of-use language. Plan to Eat: Meal Planner stakes a persona stance, framing itself as designed with the planner in mind and promising to help users find joy in meal planning again. The mismatch is breadth-of-features versus a named user and emotional payoff, which lets Plan to Eat feel purpose-built while Plan Meals reads as a general toolkit.

App A

Positioning

All-in-one feature suite

Target audience

General home cooks organising weekly meals and shopping

Value promise

Plan meals, manage recipes and build grocery lists in one place

Tone

feature-focused, upbeat

App B

Positioning

Dedicated planner's companion

Target audience

Committed home planners who store and reuse recipes

Value promise

Rediscover joy in planning with recipes, calendar and auto grocery lists

Tone

warm, persona-driven

Gap

Plan Meals - Meal Planner leads with all-in-one feature breadth and ease, while Plan to Eat: Meal Planner leads with a named persona (the planner) and an emotional payoff (find joy in meal planning again).

Opportunity

Plan Meals - Meal Planner is the only one of the two to explicitly surface Collaborate with others by sharing your meal plans, so it can own shared household planning that Plan to Eat frames around a solo planner.

Risk

The subtitle repeats Meal Planner from the title and stacks generic feature verbs without naming a user or a distinct promise, so against Plan to Eat's persona-led framing, searchers may not grasp what sets Plan Meals - Meal Planner apart and default to the listing that feels purpose-built.

Strategic advantage

The stated collaboration and sharing capability speaks to households and couples who split cooking and shopping, a shared-planning buying motive that Plan to Eat's solo-planner framing leaves open.

Missed opportunity

Neither listing leads with grocery-cost control or reducing food waste, a practical, money-saving angle that would resonate with budget-conscious households searching beyond convenience.

06Final Verdict
38 / 100
vs
62 / 100

App A

38

Plan Meals - Meal Planner

Behind

B wins

App B

62

Plan to Eat: Meal Planner

Strong lead

For meal planner, "Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" holds rank 4 to "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" at 14, and the lead looks earned: it pairs equal keyword relevance with stronger trust and a purpose-built persona stance. "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" matches on features but reads as a general toolkit for the same search.

Why it wins

"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" converts the meal planner intent better through a concrete Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009 claim and warmly received reviews on recipe importing, while "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" carries recurring paywall and lost-data complaints that undercut the same trust.

Biggest opportunity

The short description for "Plan Meals - Meal Planner" already includes meal planner exactly, so the open gain is conversion: leading with its collaboration and sharing edge to win households splitting cooking and shopping that "Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" leaves solo.

Next priority

Test a short description that fronts shared planning while keeping the keyword, such as Plan meals together: shared meal planner, recipes & auto grocery lists, and separately verify the reported deletion of saved plans, since that data-loss thread is the sharpest drag on trust.

Run your own comparison

Compare more apps, in any market or language.

See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.

Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.

Try AppTracker free

People also compared