Fastin: Intermittent Fasting
Simple fasting tracker app to lose weight! Get your body in top shape fast!
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Rank
10
For keyword
Rank
3
English (United States)Simple fasting tracker app to lose weight! Get your body in top shape fast!
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Both listings show clear timer, plan and tracking UI, so what each app does is legible. The split is on trust: "Real Results" in "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" stacks named testimonials (Mitch M., Jessica M.), a "1.8M+" user count and a store-style "4.9 24k Reviews" stat, while "Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" leans on a fabricated "99% 5-Star Ratings" star row and an unverifiable "NO.1" laurel claim.
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
B leads"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" opens on "Intermittent Fasting For Women", narrowing to one audience before the lose-weight benefit lands on screenshots 3 and 4.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" leads with "Fasting Made Easy" and "Lose weight without counting", naming benefit and method in the first frame.
Clarity
Tied"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" shows the live 16:8 timer at "10:43:23" plus a plan picker (16:8, 14:10, 18:6), making the feature set concrete.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" pairs the fasting-timer ring with a stats dashboard ("Fasts 304", weight graph), so timer and tracking read at a glance.
Emotional Hook
Tied"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" mixes outcome copy "Lose Weight" and a rocket motif with capability captions like "Body Status"; no user shown feeling the result.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" uses aspirational lines like "Your body does the work while you sleep", but frames sit on UI, not a person living the outcome.
Trust Signals
B leads"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting"'s first screenshot uses a fabricated "99% 5-Star Ratings" star row and an unverifiable "NO.1" laurel, which breach store rating-UI rules.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" carries named testimonials (Mitch M., Jessica M.) and a "1.8M+" user count across screenshots 5 and 7.
Reviews of Fastin: Intermittent Fasting most often raise subscription, refund, and unsubscribe difficulties, alongside an inability to edit a forgotten fast start time and reports of the app failing to open or install; praise centers on ease of use and weight-loss results. Reviews of Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting concentrate on features moving behind a subscription and pricing concerns, while strengths cluster around simplicity, the absence of ads, and weight-loss results.
App A
Pain points
Subscription, refund, and unsubscribe difficulty
HighCannot edit a forgotten fast start time
MediumApp fails to open or install
MediumStrengths
Easy to use and useful for tracking
HighWeight-loss results
MediumMotivational fast-stage display
LowApp B
Pain points
Features moved behind a subscription
HighPricing and no one-time purchase
MediumStrengths
Simple and easy to use
HighNo ads
MediumWeight-loss results
Medium"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" positions on the weight-loss outcome, leading with "lose weight" and "top shape fast", while "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" positions on trust and friction removal, leading with "No account. Zero ads." and a named solo founder. The two stances barely overlap: one sells a body result, the other sells a clean, private experience, so a searcher comparing them is choosing between a weight goal and a trust promise.
App A
Positioning
Weight-loss fasting tracker
Target audience
People wanting to lose weight through fasting
Value promise
Lose weight by timing when you eat, no strict dieting
Tone
encouraging, weight-loss focused
App B
Positioning
Private, ad-free fasting
Target audience
Privacy-minded fasters who dislike accounts and ads
Value promise
Start fasting free and private, no account or ads
Tone
candid, founder-led, trust-building
Gap
"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" leads with a weight-loss outcome ("lose weight"), while "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" leads with trust and simplicity ("No account. Zero ads."), so they compete on entirely different buying motives.
Opportunity
Because "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" says almost nothing about teaching a beginner how to fast, "Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" can own the guided-onboarding angle its "step-by-step guide" and "6 plans available" already support.
Risk
"Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" leads with a generic promise ("lose weight", "top shape fast") that most fasting apps also claim, so against a listing built on a concrete trust position it risks reading as interchangeable and losing users who decide on differentiation.
Strategic advantage
The listing's "step-by-step guide", "Body status", and six personalized plans point to a coaching-for-beginners edge that appeals to first-time fasters who need to be taught how to start, a motive "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" addresses only through bare plan labels.
Missed opportunity
Neither listing leads on the freedom of no calorie counting, the idea that fasting works by timing meals rather than restricting food, an angle that directly answers the beginner's fear of dieting and that both apps mention only deep in the body copy.
App A
31
Fastin: Intermittent Fasting
Far behind
B wins
App B
69
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Dominant
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting holds rank 3 for intermittent fasting while Fastin: Intermittent Fasting trails at 10, and that gap looks defensible rather than accidental. The higher listing wins on trust and a focused stance, not merely on placement.
Why it wins
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting anchors on verifiable trust, a "1.8M+" user count and a "No account. Zero ads." promise that give a searcher a concrete reason to tap. Fastin: Intermittent Fasting leans on an unverifiable "NO.1" laurel and a generic weight-loss pitch that most apps chasing intermittent fasting also make, so it reads as interchangeable.
Biggest opportunity
The title "Fastin: Intermittent Fasting" already carries intermittent fasting exactly, so the real gain is conversion: surfacing the beginner-coaching edge (step-by-step guide, six plans, no calorie counting) up front, where Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting offers only bare plan labels.
Next priority
The remaining test is whether a beginner-first short description like "Intermittent fasting made simple: guided plans, no calorie counting. Start now." converts first-time fasters faster than the current "top shape fast" promise for intermittent fasting.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker freePeople also compared
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingfasting timer
Fasting App & Calorie CounterEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Intermittent Fasting TrackerEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Intermittent Fasting TrackerEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Fast: Intermittent FastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
If: Intermittent Fasting 16:8Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Fasting - Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting