Intermittent Fasting Tracker
Fasting app & timer for weight loss. 16:8, OMAD & 5:2 fast, water tracker
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
Rank
14
For keyword
Rank
3
English (United States)Fasting app & timer for weight loss. 16:8, OMAD & 5:2 fast, water tracker
Intermittent Fasting App. 16:8, OMAD, 18:6. No account. Zero ads. Start now.
"Intermittent Fasting Tracker" opens with an aspirational hook, "Lose weight with no diet", over a girl-and-doves illustration, while "Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" counters with a full trust wall of named testimonials and "1.8M+ Users". Both explain the timer, plans and progress clearly; the edge splits between one listing's emotional imagery and the other's social proof.
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
Tied"Intermittent Fasting Tracker"'s first screenshot leads with "Lose weight with no diet" plus "Your weight loss companion", an instantly clear benefit.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting"'s first screenshot pairs "Fasting Made Easy" with "Lose weight without counting", an equally direct benefit.
Clarity
Tied"Intermittent Fasting Tracker" shows the live timer, a "30+ fasting plans" screen with 16:08/18:06/21:03, and a fasting course, making functionality obvious.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" shows the fasting ring, a "Your Plan is Ready" program, and a "Watch Your Progress" stats dashboard.
Emotional Hook
A leads"Intermittent Fasting Tracker"'s first screenshot shows a girl gazing up at rising doves under "Lose weight with no diet", an aspirational lifestyle scene.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" relies on outcome copy like "Reach 165 lbs by Jul 28" over UI screens, with no lifestyle imagery of a user.
Trust Signals
B leads"Intermittent Fasting Tracker"'s first screenshot shows self-styled laurel badges "4.7 Rating" and "270k Users"*, but no named testimonials or attribution.
"Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting" shows named testimonials ("Mitch M.", "Jessica M.", "Nicole R.") with weight results, plus "1.8M+ Users".
Intermittent Fasting Tracker draws consistent praise for being easy to use and for being free with no forced payments or ads, with only scattered, low-frequency confusion about how to end or edit a fast. Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting is also widely praised as simple and ad-free, but a clear recurring complaint is that features are increasingly locked behind a monthly subscription. The strongest contrast is the recurring pricing frustration in Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting reviews versus the recurring free-and-no-ads praise in Intermittent Fasting Tracker reviews.
App A
Pain points
Confusion ending or editing a fast
LowPro-gated features and ads
LowStrengths
Easy to use and straightforward
HighFree with no ads or forced payment
HighKeeps users on track
MediumApp B
Pain points
Subscription cost too high
HighPreviously free features now paywalled
MediumStrengths
Simple and uncluttered
HighNo ads and no sign-in
MediumInformative body-stage guidance
MediumIntermittent Fasting Tracker stakes an all-in-one, feature-breadth position (30 plans, water, weight and measurement trackers), while Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting stakes a trust-and-minimalism position (No account, Zero ads, data is never sold, solo developer). The mismatch is capability-count versus trust-and-simplicity: one listing counts what it does, the other names what it refuses to do.
App A
Positioning
All-in-one fasting tracker
Target audience
Broad fasters, beginners to experts, women and men
Value promise
Reach weight loss goals faster with 30+ plans and trackers
Tone
feature-focused, functional
App B
Positioning
Private, ad-free simplicity
Target audience
Fasters tired of accounts, ads and bloated apps
Value promise
Simple, private, ad-free fasting with a core timer free forever
Tone
personal, trust-building
Gap
Intermittent Fasting Tracker leads with feature breadth (30 plans, multiple trackers), while Easy Fast leads with trust and restraint (No account, Zero ads, Your data is never sold).
Opportunity
The gap lets Intermittent Fasting Tracker own the structured, all-in-one tracking angle for users who actively want plan variety and multiple trackers, which Easy Fast's deliberate minimalism cannot serve.
Risk
The listing frames a generic promise (reach your weight loss goals faster) with no trust or privacy signals, so against Easy Fast's explicit No account and data is never sold, privacy-conscious installers comparing the two are given no reason to prefer this listing.
Strategic advantage
The breadth of 30 plans plus water, weight and measurement trackers and badges speaks to committed, structure-seeking fasters who want one comprehensive tool, a segment Easy Fast's stripped-down positioning deliberately leaves open.
Missed opportunity
Neither listing leads on the emotional struggle of staying consistent through hunger, nor owns women's cycle-aware fasting; Intermittent Fasting Tracker mentions plans for women but buries it, leaving a coaching-and-reassurance angle unclaimed.
App A
45
Intermittent Fasting Tracker
Slight gap
B wins
App B
55
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Slight lead
For intermittent fasting, Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting holds rank 3 against Intermittent Fasting Tracker's 14, and that lead looks defensible: it pairs a named-testimonial trust wall and a sharp No account / Zero ads stance with tight keyword relevance. Intermittent Fasting Tracker matches it on clarity but leads with feature counts where Easy Fast leads with trust, and trust converts harder on this keyword.
Why it wins
Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting gives searchers a concrete reason to install first: social proof (1.8M+ Users, named testimonials) plus an explicit privacy promise (No account, Zero ads), a stronger conversion pitch than Intermittent Fasting Tracker's breadth-first list of 30 plans and trackers.
Biggest opportunity
Intermittent Fasting Tracker already owns intermittent fasting in its title, so the real gain is conversion: its reviews consistently praise being free with no forced payments or ads, the exact pricing frustration Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting's reviewers voice, yet that free-and-no-ads edge surfaces nowhere in the short description.
Next priority
The remaining test is whether front-loading that trust promise, something like Intermittent fasting timer, 16:8 & OMAD. Free, no forced payments, no ads., converts better than the current feature-and-timer line. It keeps intermittent fasting up front while answering the subscription doubt Easy Fast Intermittent Fasting leaves open.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker freePeople also compared
InterFasting - Fasting Timer
Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingfasting timer
Fasting App & Calorie CounterEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Fastin: Intermittent FastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Intermittent Fasting TrackerEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
Fast: Intermittent FastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting
If: Intermittent Fasting 16:8Easy Fast Intermittent Fastingintermittent fastingEasy Fast Intermittent Fasting
Fasting - Intermittent Fastingintermittent fasting