Eat This Much - Meal Planner
Automatic meal planner with personalized diets, grocery lists, calories & macros
Plan to Eat: Meal Planner
Recipe storage, meal planning calendar, and automated grocery lists.
Rank
6
For keyword
Rank
4
English (United States)Automatic meal planner with personalized diets, grocery lists, calories & macros
Recipe storage, meal planning calendar, and automated grocery lists.
"Eat This Much - Meal Planner" leads with an outcome, "Automatic meal plans in seconds", and shows calories, macros, and a grocery list, while "Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" leans on trust, "Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009", but its captions describe recipe storage more than a payoff. Feature clarity is even; the split is value versus credibility.
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
A leads"Eat This Much - Meal Planner"'s first screenshot pairs "Automatic meal plans in seconds" with a live plan showing 1820 calories and macros.
"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" opens on trust and "Save recipes from anywhere"; the core benefit reads as storage rather than a planned outcome.
Clarity
TiedDiet picker, grocery plus pantry list, and a Balsamic Salmon recipe with 597-calorie macros make the feature set immediately legible.
Calendar, social import icons on "Save recipes from anywhere", recipe grid, and step-by-step cooking view clearly show what the app does.
Emotional Hook
A leadsFood photography and "Delicious recipes with nutrition info" add warmth, but no target user appears in the moment the plan helps them.
"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner" shows UI on a flat blue background with feature captions like "All your recipes in one place"; no outcome feeling is evoked.
Trust Signals
B leadsThe "#1 Best Meal Planning App of 2023 - CNN Underscored" claim sits in the description only; no award or user-count cue appears in any screenshot.
"Plan to Eat: Meal Planner"'s first screenshot headlines "Trusted by 40,000+ families since 2009", a concrete user-count and longevity claim.
Reviews for Eat This Much - Meal Planner are mixed: many users praise how it takes the guesswork out of planning and tracks macros toward their goals, but a recurring set of reviews describe features locked behind premium and a smaller cluster report billing or refund frustrations. Reviews for Plan to Eat: Meal Planner are strongly positive and consistent, centered on recipe import from the web and social media and an auto-generated shopping list from the weekly plan, with only occasional mentions that a subscription is required.
App A
Pain points
Features gated behind premium
HighGenerator ignores dietary settings and repeats meals
MediumBilling and refund disputes
LowStrengths
Takes the guesswork out of planning
HighHelps hit macro and nutrition goals
MediumComprehensive free version
MediumApp B
Pain points
Subscription required to use
LowStrengths
Easy recipe import from the web
HighAuto-built shopping list from the plan
HighLong-term loyalty saving time and money
MediumEat This Much - Meal Planner stakes out automated nutrition planning, leading with "put your diet on autopilot" and calorie/macro targets generated "in seconds", while Plan to Eat: Meal Planner stakes out manual recipe organization, framing itself as the app "designed with the planner in mind" that stores your own recipes and helps you "find joy in meal planning again". The mismatch is decision-replacement versus decision-organization: one app decides what you eat, the other tidies the plans you build yourself.
App A
Positioning
Automated diet planner
Target audience
Diet and fitness users chasing calorie and macro goals
Value promise
Auto-generate complete meal plans that hit your nutrition targets in seconds
Tone
feature-focused, automation-driven
App B
Positioning
Recipe-first planning organizer
Target audience
Home cooks who plan meals from their own recipes
Value promise
Store all your recipes in one place and auto-build the shopping list
Tone
warm, hobbyist-encouraging
Gap
Eat This Much - Meal Planner leads with automation that decides your meals against calorie and macro targets, while Plan to Eat: Meal Planner leads with manually storing and organizing your own recipes.
Opportunity
Eat This Much - Meal Planner can own the hands-off, goal-driven searcher who wants a plan produced for them rather than a tool to build one, an intent Plan to Eat: Meal Planner explicitly declines by centering the planner-in-mind.
Risk
The listing's dense feature stacking (paleo, keto, allergies, cooking time, Recurring Foods) crowds out the sharp "in seconds" automation promise, which can dilute the one differentiator that separates it from recipe-organizer competitors and weaken first-glance conversion.
Strategic advantage
The autopilot framing plus quantified calorie and macro targeting is a concrete edge for weight-loss and bodybuilding users who want output, not admin, a motive Plan to Eat: Meal Planner never addresses.
Missed opportunity
Neither listing leads on relieving daily decision fatigue, the "what do I eat tonight" burden; Eat This Much - Meal Planner buries "take the anxiety out of picking what to eat" deep in the description instead of owning it up front.
App A
55
Eat This Much - Meal Planner
Slight lead
A wins
App B
45
Plan to Eat: Meal Planner
Slight gap
For meal planner, Eat This Much - Meal Planner owns the stronger listing, out-optimising Plan to Eat: Meal Planner on keyword relevance and store presence, yet it sits at rank 6 while Plan to Eat: Meal Planner holds rank 4. That gap is trust, not fit: Plan to Eat: Meal Planner's rank looks defensible only while its review advantage outweighs Eat This Much - Meal Planner's sharper keyword and automation story.
Why it wins
Eat This Much - Meal Planner leads on keyword optimization and store presence and ties on conversion for meal planner, while its one real drag is a review profile weighed down by surprise-paywall and billing complaints that currently lift Plan to Eat: Meal Planner above it.
Biggest opportunity
The short description already includes meal planner exactly, so the real gain is conversion: the "in seconds" automation payoff is buried behind a feature list instead of leading the pitch.
Next priority
The remaining test for meal planner is whether an automation-led short description like "Meal planner on autopilot: hit calorie & macro goals in seconds" converts faster than today's feature stack. Pairing it with a clear free-versus-premium line would blunt the billing complaints that lift Plan to Eat: Meal Planner's reviews.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker freePeople also compared
MealLog - Meal PlannerPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal planner
Meal Planner & Grocery ListPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal planner
Plan Meals - Meal PlannerPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal planner
MealPrepPro Meal PlannerPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal plannerPlan to Eat: Meal Planner
Meal Planner - Weekly Planmeal planner
Meal Planner & Recipe KeeperPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal planner
Weekly Menu - Meal PlannerPlan to Eat: Meal Plannermeal planner