AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus vs Hearing Test for "hearing test"

Side A
hearing test
Side B
AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus
AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus
Hearing Test
Hearing Test

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus

Test, train and get relief for your ears with clinically proven sound therapy

Hearing Test

Perform a pure-tone audiometry and speech intelligibility test on your mobile.

Rank

10

For keyword

hearing test

Rank

1

USEnglish (United States)
Google Play
Rank History
AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus
Hearing Test
AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-15: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-16: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-17: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-18: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-19: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-20: rank 11AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-21: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-22: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-23: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-24: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-25: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-26: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-27: rank 10AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus on 2026-08-28: rank 10Hearing Test on 2026-08-15: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-16: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-17: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-18: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-19: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-20: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-21: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-22: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-23: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-24: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-25: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-26: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-27: rank 1Hearing Test on 2026-08-28: rank 1
A52
48B
01Store Presence
4.25 / 13.5
vs
9.25 / 13.5
App A
App B
First released · max +1.5 pts
Feb 29, 2020
First released max +1.5 pts
+1.5Sep 24, 2013
Last updated · max +1.5 pts
Jul 23, 2026 +1.5
Last updated max +1.5 pts
Jan 1, 2026
Screenshot count · max +0.5 pts
6
Screenshot count max +0.5 pts
+0.58
Preview video · max +1 pts
Yes +1
Preview video max +1 pts
Downloads · max +3 pts
50,000+ +1.25
Downloads max +3 pts
+1.751,000,000+
App price · max +0.5 pts
Free +0.25
App price max +0.5 pts
+0.25Free
Min IAP price · max +0.5 pts
9.99 $
Min IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.5No IAP
Max IAP price · max +0.5 pts
99.99 $
Max IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.5No IAP
Ads · max +0.5 pts
No +0.25
Ads max +0.5 pts
+0.25No
Rating · max +2 pts
3.1 ★
Rating max +2 pts
+24.7 ★
Rating count · max +2 pts
299
Rating count max +2 pts
+215K
02Keyword Optimization
4 / 9
vs
5 / 9
App A
App B
Keyword in Title · max +3 pts
1/2 words
Keyword in Title max +3 pts
+3Yes (exact)
Keyword in Short Description · max +2 pts
1/2 words +1

Test, train and get relief for your ears with clinically proven sound therapy

Keyword in Short Description max +2 pts
+11/2 words

Perform a pure-tone audiometry and speech intelligibility test on your mobile.

Keyword in Description · max +2 pts
Yes (exact) +1
Keyword in Description max +2 pts
+1Yes (exact)
Keyword Density · max +1 pts
Medium (2.0%) +1
Keyword Density max +1 pts
High (3.5%)
Title Length · max +1 pts
Optimised (30 chars) +1
Title Length max +1 pts
Short (12 chars)
03Conversion Intelligence
6 / 8
vs
2 / 8

For a "hearing test" searcher, AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus wins the first impression: captioned portrait screenshots, a lifestyle photo, and a "Validated at:" row naming Stanford, Samsung Medical Center and Sutter Health. Hearing Test counters with four uncaptioned landscape screens whose audiogram, "I CAN HEAR" buttons and digit keypad explain the mechanics better than any AudioCardio shot does. Hearing Test's edge is functional legibility; everything above that layer is missing.

Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b

Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.

App A

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus screenshot 1AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus screenshot 2AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus screenshot 3AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus screenshot 4

App B

Hearing Test screenshot 1Hearing Test screenshot 2Hearing Test screenshot 3Hearing Test screenshot 4

Value Proposition

A leads
AStrong

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus's 4th screenshot states "Take a Free Hearing Test" leading to a personalized program; screenshot 1 promises "Sound Therapy That Works".

BOn par

Hearing Test's benefit lives only in the short description, "Perform a pure-tone audiometry"; none of its four screenshots carries a headline.

Clarity

B leads
AOn par

Only AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus's 4th screenshot shows product UI, a hearing score of 83.6; the daily sound therapy session screen is never pictured.

BStrong

Hearing Test shows the actual test loop: "I CAN HEAR" / "BARELY AUDIBLE" buttons, a digit keypad, a noise meter, and "Mild hearing loss" result bands.

Emotional Hook

A leads
AStrong

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus's 2nd screenshot pairs a smiling woman in headphones with "Strengthen Your Hearing"; screenshot 3 names the relief: "Relieve Ringing Ears".

BWeak

All four Hearing Test screenshots are raw charts and axis labels such as "SNR [dB]"; no person, outcome phrase, or emotional framing appears.

Trust Signals

A leads
AStrong

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus's 3rd screenshot lists "Validated at:" with Stanford University, Samsung Medical Center and Sutter Health logos, all named institutions.

BWeak

Hearing Test's only credibility cue is grey footer text, "coeff. from database, calib. ID: 3889769"; no testimonial, certification, or install-count badge is visible.

04Review Intelligence
2 / 10
vs
8 / 10

Reviews of AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus split sharply: a substantial group reports real hearing and tinnitus gains after one to three months and quick email support, while a comparable group reports crashes during sound therapy sessions, a subscription wall reached before any therapy can be tried, and no measurable change after months of use. Reviews of Hearing Test are dominated by comparisons against clinical audiograms, with users repeatedly saying results matched a doctor's office visit, plus praise for being free and ad-free and for tracking hearing recovery over time. The main friction reported for Hearing Test is headphone calibration, where compatibility and the need for a normally hearing helper come up across several reviews.

App A: 100 reviews App B: 100 reviews

App A

100 reviews

Pain points

Crashes and interrupted therapy sessions

High

Subscription required before any therapy trial

Medium

No measured improvement after months of use

Medium

Strengths

Reported hearing clarity gains after one to two months

High

Reported tinnitus relief and tolerability

Medium

Fast support replies that resolve issues

Medium

App B

100 reviews

Pain points

Headphone calibration depends on outside help or supported models

Medium

Occasional mismatch with a known hearing loss

Low

Strengths

Results matching clinical audiograms

High

Repeat testing to track hearing recovery

Medium

Free and ad-free testing

Medium
05Positioning Gap
12.5 / 15
vs
2.5 / 15

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus positions the test as an on-ramp to treatment, leading with "clinically proven" sound therapy and named research institutions, while Hearing Test positions itself as a measurement instrument, leading with "pure-tone audiometry", digits-in-noise and calibration coefficients. Against the query "hearing test", one listing answers with a therapy program and the other answers with the test itself, so they compete for the same search but satisfy different intents. The mismatch is intent depth: Hearing Test matches the literal request, AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus reframes it as the first step of an ongoing regimen.

App A

Positioning

Clinically backed hearing therapy

Target audience

Adults with tinnitus or declining hearing seeking treatment

Value promise

A quick test generates daily personalised sound therapy per ear

Tone

clinical-credential led, benefit-forward

App B

Positioning

Mobile audiometry instrument

Target audience

Self-testers wanting audiometric accuracy without a clinic

Value promise

Measure hearing thresholds and speech intelligibility with calibrated accuracy

Tone

feature-focused, technical, procedural

Gap

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus leads with therapy and outcome, "strengthen your hearing, and provide relief", while Hearing Test leads with measurement method, "pure-tone audiometry and the digits-in-noise test", so one sells what happens after the result and the other sells the accuracy of the result itself.

Opportunity

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus can own the question Hearing Test leaves unanswered, what to do once a threshold comes back low, converting a diagnostic search into an ongoing treatment relationship.

Risk

The title fronts a brand name and the condition word "Tinnitus", and the visible copy moves quickly into subscription tiers, so a user who typed "hearing test" may read the listing as a paid program rather than a test and click the plainly named alternative instead. Trust risk compounds this: Hearing Test explains calibration and headphone handling, while AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus asserts clinical proof without describing how its own hearing check is administered.

Strategic advantage

Named clinical partners including Stanford Univ. and Samsung Medical Center, plus the trademarked Threshold Sound Conditioning™ framing, give AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus institutional credibility that a pure test tool cannot match. That matters most to tinnitus sufferers who have already self-tested and are shopping for something that acts on the result.

Missed opportunity

Neither listing speaks to the person testing someone else, an adult child checking an aging parent's hearing at the kitchen table, which is a common trigger for this search. Neither bridges to professional care either, so nobody owns the position of the test that tells you whether it is time to see an audiologist.

06Final Verdict
52 / 100
vs
48 / 100

App A

52

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus

Even

A wins

App B

48

Hearing Test

Even

AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus edges ahead overall on conversion craft and positioning depth, yet Hearing Test owns position 1 for hearing test because its listing answers the query literally while AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus reframes it as a therapy program. The margin is thin enough that trust signals, not listing polish, decide who holds the top of this query.

Why it wins

For a hearing test searcher, AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus wins the first impression: captioned screenshots and a "Validated at:" row naming Stanford, Samsung Medical Center and Sutter Health, set against four uncaptioned landscape screens. Its exposure sits in reviews, where crashes during sound therapy and a subscription wall reached before therapy begins run against Hearing Test's repeated reports of results matching a clinical audiogram.

Biggest opportunity

Neither the title nor the short description of AudioCardio Hearing & Tinnitus carries hearing test as a phrase, so the clearest gain is owning the literal query in copy that already has the institutional credibility Hearing Test cannot match.

Next priority

The test worth running is a short description that leads with the hearing test and keeps sound therapy as the payoff, for example "Hearing test plus clinically proven daily sound therapy for tinnitus relief" (75 characters). Running that alongside an Android stability release for the sound therapy session lifecycle addresses the session crashes that dominate the sampled complaints.

Run your own comparison

Compare more apps, in any market or language.

See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.

Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.

Try AppTracker free

People also compared