Side A
time tracker
Side B
Time Clock: Easy Tracker
Time Clock: Easy Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker

Time Clock: Easy Tracker

Clock in with work hours tracker or simply add your time cards. Nice & easy

WorkingHours Time Tracker

Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker

Rank

4

For keyword

time tracker

Rank

3

USEnglish (United States)
Google Play
Rank History
Time Clock: Easy Tracker
WorkingHours Time Tracker
Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-14: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-15: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-16: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-17: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-18: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-19: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-20: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-21: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-22: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-23: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-24: rank 4Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-25: rank 5Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-26: rank 5Time Clock: Easy Tracker on 2026-07-27: rank 4WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-14: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-15: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-16: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-17: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-18: rank 2WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-19: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-20: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-21: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-22: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-23: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-24: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-25: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-26: rank 3WorkingHours Time Tracker on 2026-07-27: rank 3
A44
56B
01Store Presence
5.75 / 12.5
vs
6.75 / 12.5
App A
App B
First released · max +1.5 pts
Jan 14, 2019
First released max +1.5 pts
+1.5Sep 20, 2017
Last updated · max +1.5 pts
Jul 18, 2026 +0.25
Last updated max +1.5 pts
+1.25Jul 25, 2026
Screenshot count · max +0.5 pts
15 +0.5
Screenshot count max +0.5 pts
8
Downloads · max +3 pts
1,000,000+ +1.75
Downloads max +3 pts
+1.25100,000+
App price · max +0.5 pts
Free +0.25
App price max +0.5 pts
+0.25Free
Min IAP price · max +0.5 pts
0.99 $ +0.25
Min IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.250.99 $
Max IAP price · max +0.5 pts
179.99 $
Max IAP price max +0.5 pts
+0.510.99 $
Ads · max +0.5 pts
No +0.5
Ads max +0.5 pts
Yes
Rating · max +2 pts
4.7 ★ +0.75
Rating max +2 pts
+1.254.8 ★
Rating count · max +2 pts
25K +1.5
Rating count max +2 pts
+0.54K
02Keyword Optimization
2 / 9
vs
7 / 9
App A
App B
Keyword in Title · max +3 pts
All words (2/2)
Keyword in Title max +3 pts
+3Yes (exact)
Keyword in Short Description · max +2 pts
All words (2/2) +1

Clock in with work hours tracker or simply add your time cards. Nice & easy

Keyword in Short Description max +2 pts
+1All words (2/2)

Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker

Keyword in Description · max +2 pts
All words (2/2)
Keyword in Description max +2 pts
+2Yes (exact)
Keyword Density · max +1 pts
Medium (2.7%) +0.5
Keyword Density max +1 pts
+0.5Medium (1.9%)
Title Length · max +1 pts
Optimised (24 chars) +0.5
Title Length max +1 pts
+0.5Optimised (25 chars)
03Conversion Intelligence
5 / 8
vs
3 / 8

Time Clock: Easy Tracker gains a structural edge through four screenshots each paired with a clear feature headline, with screenshot 1's earnings dashboard ($320/week, $4,000/month) immediately signalling pay-tracking value. WorkingHours Time Tracker opens with "For freelancer & employees" (audience framing) rather than an outcome, and its sharpest copy, "Time tracking with just a click", arrives only in screenshot 2. Neither listing surfaces emotional hooks or visible trust signals, leaving the primary conversion levers unaddressed on both sides.

Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b

Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.

App A

App A screenshot 1App A screenshot 2App A screenshot 3App A screenshot 4

App B

App B screenshot 1App B screenshot 2App B screenshot 3App B screenshot 4

Value Proposition

A leads
AOn par

Screenshot 1's earnings UI ($120/day, $4,000/month visible) signals pay-tracking value, but "The perfect work hours tracker" is a generic superlative that names no specific benefit.

BWeak

WorkingHours Time Tracker opens with "For freelancer & employees" (audience label) in screenshot 1; no screenshot in the set anchors on a concrete user outcome.

Clarity

A leads
AStrong

Each of four screenshots pairs a feature headline with matching UI: "Clock in & out" shows live timers, "Add entries manually" shows the entry form.

BOn par

Screenshots 1-2 show dense tagged timelines that require reading to parse; screenshot 4's "GPS geofence, notification & widget" names and shows three distinct features clearly.

Emotional Hook

Tied
AWeak

All four screenshots are UI mockups on gradient backgrounds; no lifestyle imagery or copy names an emotional outcome for the time-tracking user.

BWeak

"Time tracking with just a click" hints at ease, but no visual across the four WorkingHours Time Tracker screenshots supports the relief that claim implies.

Trust Signals

Tied
AWeak

No testimonials, user-count claims, compliance badges, or press mentions appear in any Time Clock: Easy Tracker screenshot; trust is entirely absent from the visual set.

BWeak

WorkingHours Time Tracker surfaces no trust cues across its four screenshots; no named award, user count, or compliance badge is visible.

04Review Intelligence
4 / 10
vs
6 / 10

Time Clock: Easy Tracker is praised for ease of use by a large share of reviewers, but faces a notable cluster of sign-in and authentication failures that lock users out of their stored data. WorkingHours Time Tracker shares the same core strength of simplicity and additionally earns recurring praise for its one-time purchase model, while its negative themes are fewer and confined to undisclosed premium feature gating and occasional geofencing inconsistencies.

App A: 100 reviews App B: 100 reviews

App A

100 reviews

Pain points

sign-in and authentication failures locking users out of stored data

Medium

intrusive auto-playing audio ads disrupting professional use

Low

subscription pricing perceived as high relative to free expectations

Low

Strengths

ease of use praised consistently across diverse user types

High

multiple job tracking within a single app

Low

downloadable timesheet with earnings calculation for employer reporting

Low

App B

100 reviews

Pain points

premium paywall gating features not clearly disclosed as paid-only

Low

geofencing auto clock-in behaving unreliably

Low

Strengths

ease of use and minimal, focused design

High

one-time purchase with no recurring subscription

Medium

timesheet-to-invoice export for freelance billing

Low
05Positioning Gap
3.5 / 15
vs
11.5 / 15

Time Clock: Easy Tracker leads with ease of entry"Nice & easy," "simply add your time cards" — framing itself as an approachable tool for a broad audience of businesses and individuals alike. WorkingHours Time Tracker leads with a consequence promise"without turning your day into admin work" — staking out professional efficiency for a named roster of worker types. The structural mismatch is approachability-as-feature versus outcome-as-lead, which positions the two listings at different stages of the buyer's awareness.

App A

Positioning

Accessibility-first payroll tool

Target audience

Small businesses and individuals needing easy time cards

Value promise

Eliminate paperwork and get compensated with minimal effort

Tone

warm, approachable, emoji-led, feature-enumerated

App B

Positioning

Friction-free professional time log

Target audience

Freelancers, contractors, and hourly employees logging billable work

Value promise

Track time and earnings without admin overhead consuming your day

Tone

calm, professional, outcome-oriented, feature-organised

Gap

Time Clock: Easy Tracker leads with ease-as-feature ("Nice & easy," "simply add your time cards"), while WorkingHours Time Tracker leads with outcome-as-promise ("without turning your day into admin work"), so one listing competes on approachability and the other on a named consequence.

Opportunity

Time Clock: Easy Tracker has payroll and billing specifics buried in its description — GPS clock-in, XLSX export, "Slash bi-weekly payroll hours" — that WorkingHours Time Tracker does not foreground; surfacing one of these in the short description would let Time Clock: Easy Tracker claim the small-business payroll angle before a user reads past the fold.

Risk

The simultaneous "Small Businesses and Individuals" targeting in Time Clock: Easy Tracker's description signals no primary audience, which can cause the listing to read as generic to the professional searcher who needs assurance the tool handles payroll at scale. A user scanning quickly may default to WorkingHours Time Tracker if they identify as a professional, since that listing confirms their use case by name.

Strategic advantage

Time Clock: Easy Tracker is the only listing that names GPS clock-in and XLSX payroll export, giving it a concrete edge with small-business owners managing hourly employees who need audit-ready records — a segment WorkingHours Time Tracker's copy does not directly address.

Missed opportunity

Neither listing speaks to the freelancer's specific anxiety about underbilling — the feeling of knowing more hours were worked than can be proven — which is a high-intent emotional entry point that neither "Nice & easy" nor "without turning your day into admin work" directly resolves, leaving it unclaimed in the category.

06Final Verdict
44 / 100
vs
56 / 100

App A

44

Time Clock: Easy Tracker

Slight gap

B wins

App B

56

WorkingHours Time Tracker

Slight lead

For the keyword time tracker, WorkingHours Time Tracker holds position 3 with a listing built around an outcome promise and a short description that names four concrete use cases, while Time Clock: Easy Tracker sits one spot below with copy that leads on approachability rather than a job-to-be-done. The one-position gap reflects a real positioning deficit, not a coin-flip.

Why it wins

WorkingHours Time Tracker's short description, "Timesheet, employee time clock, billable hours & overtime tracker", front-loads four keyword-dense use cases that align directly with what a time tracker searcher is scanning for, while also earning stronger review sentiment around its one-time purchase model, which reduces the trust barrier at the point of conversion.

Biggest opportunity

The short description already includes "work hours tracker" as a near-variant of time tracker, so the remaining headroom is on the benefit side: GPS clock-in and XLSX payroll export are concrete differentiators that WorkingHours Time Tracker's copy never names, giving Time Clock: Easy Tracker a factual edge it has not yet surfaced above the fold.

Next priority

The remaining test is whether a short description like "Time tracker for payroll, GPS clock-in & XLSX timesheets" (54 chars) converts better than the current "Nice & easy" framing by leading with the payroll-and-billing outcome instead of approachability, while keeping the time tracker keyword in place.

Run your own comparison

Compare more apps, in any market or language.

See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.

Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.

Try AppTracker free

People also compared