NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan vs Eat This Much - Meal Planner for "diet plan"
NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan
Track Nutrition & Create Diet Plan for Weight Loss, Diabetes, PCOS, or Pregnancy
Eat This Much - Meal Planner
Automatic meal planner with personalized diets, grocery lists, calories & macros
Rank
7
For keyword
Rank
2
English (United States)Track Nutrition & Create Diet Plan for Weight Loss, Diabetes, PCOS, or Pregnancy
Automatic meal planner with personalized diets, grocery lists, calories & macros
Eat This Much - Meal Planner answers the "diet plan" query directly with "Automatic meal plans in seconds" over four readable product screens, while NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan leads with a photo-logging hero and human outcome imagery. NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan owns the emotional side through the salad-eating photo and the "Hit your health goals in 10 weeks" chart, but its drawn star rows on screenshots 2 and 4 imitate store rating UI and undercut an otherwise usable 30,000-user claim.
Scanned screenshots4 a · 4 b
Only the first 4 screenshots from each side are sent to the AI. These are what users see in App Store and Google Play search results, so they carry most of the conversion weight.
App A
App B
Value Proposition
B leadsNutriScan - Track & Diet Plan's hero says "Track Calories & Plan Diet Easily", but screenshots 2 to 4 pivot to logging and analysis, not planning.
Eat This Much - Meal Planner's first screenshot pairs "Automatic meal plans in seconds" with "Based on your tastes and nutrition targets", matching the "diet plan" intent.
Clarity
B leadsOnly screenshot 3 shows real UI ("Apple - 95 kcal" plus a macro donut); screenshots 2 and 4 are illustrated captions with no interface.
Four working screens: a day meal plan with per-item calories, a diet-type picker, a checkbox grocery list, and a recipe with macros.
Emotional Hook
A leadsScreenshot 3 photographs a smiling woman eating a salad; screenshot 2 pairs a "Reaching Goals" curve with "feel great!" in a user quote.
Warm plated-salmon and produce photography sits behind every phone frame, but captions such as "Grocery lists with everything you need" name features, not feelings.
Trust Signals
TiedDrawn star rows under the quotes on screenshots 2 and 4 imitate store rating UI, which Play rejects, despite the real "Loved by over 30,000 users" line.
The "#1 Best Meal Planning App of 2023 - CNN Underscored" line sits only in the description; no screenshot carries a badge, quote, or user count.
Reviewers of NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan repeatedly report that logging stops working after a handful of free entries, that calorie figures vary between logs of the same dish, and that the app closes unexpectedly during manual entry, while the same sample praises how quick and beginner friendly the tracking flow is. Reviewers of Eat This Much - Meal Planner most often describe generated plans that include excluded ingredients and features held behind the subscription, alongside strong praise for automated meal decisions and for how much the free tier already offers. Both sets of reviews name subscription limits, but Eat This Much - Meal Planner draws more recurring praise for its free experience.
App A
Pain points
Early paywall on core logging
HighInconsistent calorie values
MediumCrashes during manual meal entry
MediumStrengths
Easy for beginners to log food
HighCalorie and macro tracking
MediumVisible weight loss results
MediumApp B
Pain points
Plans include excluded ingredients
MediumShort free window before subscription
MediumBilling and refund handling
LowStrengths
Removes the guesswork from eating
MediumSubstantial free version with recipes
MediumExclusions for dietary restrictions
MediumNutriScan - Track & Diet Plan positions itself as condition-specific nutrition care, opening on "Struggling with weight loss, diabetes, PCOS, pregnancy" and pairing photo-based logging with 28-day plans. Eat This Much - Meal Planner positions itself as planning automation, opening on "Put your diet on autopilot" and selling the removal of decision work. The mismatch is who the plan is for versus how the plan gets made: one listing sorts users by health condition, the other by diet style, calorie target and schedule.
App A
Positioning
Condition-specific diet planning
Target audience
People managing PCOS, diabetes, pregnancy or weight loss
Value promise
AI meal scanning plus 28-day plans built for your condition
Tone
problem-aware, clinically reassuring
App B
Positioning
Automated meal planning engine
Target audience
Dieters following keto, vegan, paleo or macro targets
Value promise
Tell it your goals and it generates the whole plan
Tone
feature-focused, confident, utilitarian
Gap
NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan leads with the user's medical situation ("diabetes, PCOS, pregnancy"), while Eat This Much - Meal Planner leads with mechanism and control ("the automatic meal planner", budget, cooking time, macro targets).
Opportunity
For someone searching "diet plan" because a doctor raised their A1c or they were just diagnosed with PCOS, only NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan names their situation in the first impression, which is a stronger match than any diet-style filter list.
Risk
The 80-character short description of NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan carries tracking, planning and four separate conditions at once, so a user with one condition sees a general nutrition app rather than an app built for them, which flattens the exact advantage the listing is trying to claim. The unattributed "95% accuracy" figure also sits in a health context where readers apply more scrutiny than in a fitness one.
Strategic advantage
The dietitian-verification claim plus named clinical conditions gives NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan credibility with users who treat food as medical management, a segment Eat This Much - Meal Planner does not address since its personalisation axes are preference-based (paleo, keto, allergies, budget).
Missed opportunity
Neither listing speaks to the person cooking one meal for a household with conflicting needs, for example a diabetic adult and a partner on a normal diet, which is the practical reason many diet plans get abandoned. Neither also frames adherence over weeks, only plan generation.
App A
47
NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan
Slight gap
B wins
App B
53
Eat This Much - Meal Planner
Slight lead
Eat This Much - Meal Planner holds rank 2 on diet plan against rank 7 for NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan, but the two listings sit within a few points of each other overall, so the rank gap is wider than the quality gap. The deciding factor is trust: NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan carries the stronger keyword match, while Eat This Much - Meal Planner carries the stronger listing facts and review sentiment.
Why it wins
Eat This Much - Meal Planner converts the query more directly, opening on "Automatic meal plans in seconds" across four readable product screens, and its reviewers repeatedly praise how much the free tier already delivers. NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan wins the keyword match itself but loses ground where reviewers describe logging stopping after a handful of free entries and calorie figures varying between logs of the same dish.
Biggest opportunity
The short description of NutriScan - Track & Diet Plan already includes diet plan exactly, so the gain is no longer coverage but clarity: it currently carries tracking, planning and four conditions at once, and the dietitian-verified, condition-specific angle is something Eat This Much - Meal Planner never addresses.
Next priority
Test a short description that leads with the credential and the conditions rather than the verb pair, for example "Dietitian-verified diet plans for PCOS, diabetes, pregnancy & weight loss" at 71 characters. Pair it with keeping manual logging unmetered, since the free-tier limit is the single complaint reviewers raise most.
Run your own comparison
Compare more apps, in any market or language.
See AI recommendations on how to beat your competitor.
Track keyword rankings across every store and locale. Free to start.
Try AppTracker free
